National Legal Aid & Defender Association Join NLADA
  About NLADA  | Civil Resources  | Defender Resources  | Training and Conferences  | Communication Resources  | Member Services  | Job Opportunities  | NLADA Insurance Program
 
American Council of Chief Defenders
Sections
Defending Immigrants Partnership
E-Library
Forensics Library
Funding/Resources
Government Relations
National Alliance of Sentencing Advocates and Mitigation Specialists
National Defender Leadership Institute
NIDC
Practitioner's Corner

Public Information
Public Opinion
Right to Counsel Resource Kit
Standards
Technology
Defender_Trainers
Forensics Library
Printer Friendly Page

 
Handwriting

Testimony of handwriting experts has been allowed for years, but has recently come under attack. Whether the subjective opinions of so-called experts are more accurate than those of untutored jurors is subject to debate.

New to the topic. Click "where do I start."

Where do I start?   Submit a Document
 
  • Forensics Library
    • Handwriting Handwriting
      • Handwriting Cases Handwriting Cases
        Document U.S. v. Crisp 4th circuit majority upholds fingerprint and handwriting admissiblity, but dissent holds that admission of both fingerprint and handwriting evidence were abuses of discretion.
        [ 03/31/03  |  Submitter: 4th Circuit  |  more info ]