Eyewitness Identification
  
Eyewitness identification is one of the most potent and effective tools available to police and prosecutors.  It is compelling, and time after time, it convinces juries of the guilt of a defendant.  The problem is, eyewitness identifications are WRONG at least 50% of the time!

Read about the real-life victims of faulty eyewitness identification and see what experts have to say on this subject.

Note:  We add links to updates with the original news articles reporting death penalty issues, so be sure to scroll down to check for "new news".

Mistaken eyewitness identification is the major reason innocent people have been sent to prison in Virginia, a two-year study of 11 wrongful convictions concludes. Preventing such tragedies could be as simple as changing police procedures or as expensive as improving the quality of legal help given poor people in Virginia, which pays court-appointed lawyers the lowest fees in the nation.

In May 1981, when Michael Williams was 16, a jury in Jonesboro, LA rejected his claim of innocence, deliberating for less than an hour before convicting him of the savage beating and sexual assault of his math tutor.  Nearly 24 years after his arrest, independent DNA tests by three laboratories, including the Louisiana state crime lab, show what Williams has long contended: He is not the man who committed the crime.

The victim, shot while riding on the back of her husband's motorcycle in South Florida, identified someone else as her assailant.  The best-positioned eyewitness was unable to pick out Persad from a photo lineup; he, too, picked someone else.  He couldn't identify him in court, either.  The same eyewitness said there was nothing unusual about the assailant's car, while Persad's car had foreign slogans written all over it.  Moreover, three witnesses testified Persad was studying for an exam with them when the incident happened.  But the victim's husband was shown a photo of Persad by an ex-FBI investigator, told Persad was the assailant, identified him in court -- and Persad is doing 43 years in prison.

Clarence Harrison of Decatur, GA, has spent 17 years in prison for rape, kidnapping and robbery.  The victim identified him from both a photo and live lineup.  He has become the 150th person proven innocent by DNA in the past ten years.

Arthur Lee Whitfield spent part of his first hours of freedom standing up on the bus that carried him home. Whitfield was released from prison after DNA tests exonerated him of raping two women in Ghent, VA in August 1981.  He had served 22 years of a 63-year sentence.  Whitfield had little to say to the investigator who helped convict him, or to the two women who at trial said they were sure he was the man who had raped them.  “It would be nice for them to say they made a mistake,” he said. “It takes a big person to say they made a mistake.”

This Sharpes, FL case was a classic -- mistaken victim identification and perjured snitch testimony put him in prison for a 1981 rape.  He has been exonerated by DNA, and freed after 22 years.

After nine men were convicted here for crimes they did not commit, Boston police and the Suffolk County district attorney's office have agreed on a series of reforms on how evidence is gathered, especially from witnesses to a crime. 

Click HERE to read the Report of the Task Force on Eyewitness Evidence.

David Lemus and Olmado Hidalgo have spent 12 years in jail for the murder of a New York City nightclub bouncer named Marcus Peterson and the attempted murder of another man on Nov. 23, 1990.  Three eyewitnesses identified Jose Figueroa.as the man who had acted as a mediator between the bouncers and the murderers during an argument earlier in the night.  But Figueroa was in jail that night, and the same eyewitnesses also identified Lemus and Hidalgo.

Victims who get a good long look at violent criminals are unlikely to identify them accurately later, Yale and U.S. Navy researchers have found. This caveat follows from a unique study of 509 Navy and Marine officers undergoing elite survival training at Fort Bragg, N.C. Results suggest that police and juries may give eyewitness testimony too much credibility.

Michael Roper's case has all the hallmarks of a wrongful conviction -- shaky eyewitness identification, jailhouse "snitch" testimony and no physical evidence connecting him to the murder of an Akron, Ohio convenience store owner.  At his 4th trial the jury convicted him, but they didn't know another suspect closely resembles Roper.

UPDATE:  Michael Roper denied new trial despite prosecutor misconduct.  

In 1997 an assailant dropped his hat when he shot Boston police officer Gregory Gallagher in the buttocks.  Then the shooter burst into a nearby home, drank a glass of water and dropped his sweatshirt before fleeing.  Later Officer Gallagher identified Stephan Cowans as the assailant (although the woman whose home was invaded disagreed) and a crime lab technician said a fingerprint on the water glass was Stephan's.  Now DNA has trumped both.  DNA on the hat, the sweatshirt and the water glass are from the same person -- but not from Stephan.

Link:  Landmark Series from the Winston-Salem, NC Journal
Murder, Race, Justice
The State of North Carolina v. Darryl Hunt

When a 19-year-old black man was charged with the murder of 25-year-old Deborah Sykes, it set off a case that has helped define race relations in Winston-Salem for nearly 20 years.  Hunt was convicted twice despite the lack of physical evidence and DNA tests that excluded him.  Although such DNA test results have freed numerous others in rape and murder cases, Hunt remains in prison.

February 7, 2004:  Darryl Hunt Exonerated.  Darryl Hunt's long imprisonment in connection with the 1984 rape and murder of Deborah Sykes in Winston-Salem, NC was a case of mistaken identity. Another man killed her, the police and prosecutors have admitted. And most importantly, that man acted alone.  Unfortunately, police and prosecutors were so thorough in inciting hatred and a desire for revenge against Darryl Hunt in Deborah Sykes' family that her mother and step-father refuse to accept Hunt's innocence.  Bitter Justice

Other so-called forensic identification sciences, including microscopic hair analysis, handwriting identification, bite-mark analysis, ballistics, and even fingerprints have also been under attack in recent years. The Supreme Court, in its 1993 Daubert decision, established the “known rate of error” as one of the indicia of scientific reliability.  Yet courts continue to admit "ear witness identification" and juries continue to convict innocent people believing witnesses are much better at voice recognition than research indicates. Falling on Deaf Ears

Steven A. Avery was a 23-year-old father of five, including 6-day-old twin boys, when he was arrested for rape in July 1985 at his rural Manitowoc County, Wisconsin  home.  As many as 16 witnesses eventually would say that Avery could not have been on the beach at the time. But the victim was sure Avery was the man who raped her; a jury found him guilty of sexual assault and attempted murder, and a judge sentenced him to 32 years in prison.  After 17 years in prison, DNA Has Cleared Him

After 17 years in prison - most of it seeking DNA tests to prove his innocence - Lonnie Erby walked free on August 25th because genetic testing conclusively showed he had not committed two of the three rapes for which he was convicted.  His exoneration came despite strenuous opposition by Circuit Attorney Jenniver Joyce, who argued the DNA testing would cause unnecessary upheaval for victims and their families and unneeded expense.  All three victims picked him out of a line up.  Lonnie Erby

People think of memory as a videotape recording in the brain.  But few people, if any, can reliably distinguish between memories of something they've been shown and something they've been asked to imagine.  In fact, we assemble our memories by patching together broken pieces of stored information and then filling in the blanks. Now there is hope of a False Memory Detector

Dana Holland, 35, was freed after a Cook County judge found him not guilty in a retrial on the 1993 attempted murder and armed robbery of a woman in Chicago.  Holland had been linked to that crime by a wallet found at the scene that had belonged to another woman, a rape victim. Holland was originally convicted of that rape, but DNA evidence exonerated him of it earlier this year. He had been sentenced to more than 100 years in prison for both crimes and served 10 years.  The victim of the attempted murder testified against Holland again this week, identifying him in court. Eyewitnesses Rarely Concede Error

After 11 years in prison, DNA has cleared Michael Mercer of raping a 17-year-old girl.  The victim saw Mercer 2 months after she was attacked and identified him as her assailant.  She was certain, but she was wrong

In 1983, in Lowell, MA, two rape victims identified Dennis Maher as their assailant.  For 19 years, Dennis protested his innocence.  DNA tests have confirmed his innocence and he has been freed.  126th DNA Exoneration

Of the 125 wrongly convicted persons exonerated by DNA, Marvin Anderson is the only one where the real rapist was shown to the victim in the original photo spread, and instead she picked an innocent man.  Fallibility of Eyewitness Identication

In 1998, a rape victim identified Josiah Sutton as one of her assailants when she saw him on the street, and the Houston, Texas crime lab claimed DNA tests implicated him.  The crime lab has been shut down because of the poor quality of its work, and new DNA tests have excluded Josiah.  4 1/2 Years in Prison -- for Nothing

Over 21 years ago, a rape victim in Hampton Roads, VA saw Julius Ruffin on an elevator and insisted he was her attacker.  After two mistrials, he was convicted at a third trial and sentenced to five life terms.  Now he has been Cleared by DNA.

Eleven years after Terry Arndt was murdered and his girlfriend raped in Shasta County, CA, the rape victim identified Thomas Brewster as the assailant -- even though she failed to pick him out of a line up 6 days after the attack.  The charges cost Brewster almost 2 years pre-trial in jail; DNA tests cleared him 8 weeks into his capital murder trial.  Now it's The System's Turn to Pay

Louisville, KY financial advisor Troy Rufra was identified by four eyewitnesses as the man who robbed an equal number of banks.  The eyewitnesses were sure.  The problem?  The Eyewitnesses were Wrong

 Bernard Webster spent 20 years in prison for raping a Baltimore, MD woman when he was 19 years old.  He was repeatedly denied parole because he refused to admit his guilt.  Now DNA has established Bernard's innocence.  The victim remains convinced of her identification of him. 115th Person Freed by DNA

In 1984, Larry Johnson of St. Louis, MO was sentenced to life plus 30 years for the rape, sodomy, kidnapping and robbery of a college student.  His conviction was based primarily on the victim's identification of him.  Fast forward to February, 2002.  Broken waterpipes in the courthouse led to discovery of the original rape kit.  DNA Exonerates Larry Johnson 
 
  Faulty eyewitness identification and coerced confessions are two of the leading factors in the conviction of innocent people for crimes they did not committ.  Yet two simple measures could go a long way toward ensuring that findings of criminal guilt are genuine.  True Confessions
 
Nicholas Mobley was locked up for 29 days before murder charges against him were dropped.  He is no longer considered a suspect in that slaying, according to police who have acknowledged for the first time that the man's picture was mistakenly picked out of a photo lineup by 5 witnesses.  Eyewitness ID Strikes Out Again
 
Richard Alexander and Anthony Robinson have a lot in common.  Both were convicted of rape based on eyewitness identification.  Both served long stretches in prison.  Both were innocent and were exonerated by DNA.  Each is responding to the injustice done him in his own way.

Richard Alexander Sues South Bend, Indiana Police

Anthony Robinson Studies Law

 
Children are the most suggestible of witnesses, particularly when the perpetrator of a ghastly, traumatic crime bears a strong physical resemblance to someone they know.  Clarence Elkins of Magnolia, Ohio was convicted of rape and murder four 4 years ago because his niece -- who was six years old at the time -- made just such an error.  She has now identified another man as her grandmother's killer, a man who bears a striking resemblance to her uncle.  Will the Court Admit Error?

UPDATE:  Judge Grants Request for Hearing on New DNA Evidence in Elkins Case
 
Iowa State University psychology professor Gary Wells, who has written extensively on the subject, says unfounded eyewitness identifications are the greatest single cause of wrongful convictions.  Chicago Tribune columnist Steve Chapman examines what we can do to protect against Our Lyin' Eyes.
 
Meet Michael Kenneth McAlister of Richmond, VA.  He's the victim of mistaken identity by the victim of attempted rape.  Even the investigator and prosecutor who put him in prison doubt his guilt.  They went to the parole board in support of his release, but this is Virginia so the parole board denied McAlister's bid.  He is Without Hope

In 1986, a masked man attempted to rape a young mother in Richmond, VA.  She was the first victim.  Kenneth McAlister looked a lot like the would-be rapist.  He was the second victim.  McAlister served 18 years in prison for a crime in which he had no part.  He was denied parole and pardon even though the detective who arrested him and the prosecutor who charged him went to bat for him, admitted their mistake and said they believe he is innocent.  He was released on mandatory parole.  Mandatory Freedom
 
In 1988, EPA agent David Delitta was murdered in a Houston, TX street robbery.  The surviving robbery victim helped police work up a composite of the killer, and a detective thought he recognized Anibal Rousseau.  Six months later Rousseau was on Death Row, swift and simple as that.  Except Rousseau didn't commit the crime.  The murder weapon -- in police custody when Anibal was tried -- was traced to another man with a history of robbery and no connection to Rousseau.  But Rousseau is Still On Death Row.
 
Frank Green of the Richmond (VA) Times-Dispatch examines the most infamous faulty eyewitness identification case of our times -- Ronald Cotton -- and compares it with numerous similar cases that have come to light recently.  He concludes: The Eyes Don't Have It
 
Richard Alexander of South Bend, Indiana was arrested in August of 1996, charged with a series of rapes, convicted of two of them and sentenced in 1998 to 70 years in prison.  Police said they had a "gut feeling" Richard was innocent, but went forward on the basis of eyewitness identification.  The attacks continued after Richard's arrest, so more than "gut feeling" may have been involved.  The real rapist has confessed and DNA has excluded Richard.  The witnesses were certain.  The Witnesses were Mistaken
 
In 1982 a victim of abduction and rape picked Marvin Lamont Anderson from a photo spread and in a police lineup. The photo was obtained from his employer and was different from the other photos in the spread, one of Anderson's lawyers has said. Also, none of the men used in the photo spread was in the police lineup.  In 1988, another man confessed to the crime, but a judge rejected his confession.  Now Anderson has been Cleared by DNA
 
Incorrect eyewitness testimony convicted most of those cleared by DNA over the past several years.
Eyes Might Not Have It
Could This Happen to Your Spouse or Child? Freeing the Innocent
Cross-Racial Identification
Articles, Case Histories, TV and Radio Clips, and More from one of the top US experts in eyewitness identification.
Gary L. Wells, Ph.D.
See the statistical role erroneous eyewitness identification has played in convictions overturned by DNA
Database of Wrongful Incarcerations

In 1984, Jennifer Thompson was brutally raped.  She concentrated on memorizing her attacker's features.  When she picked Ronald Cotton out of a line up, Jennifer says, 

"I was Certain, But I was Wrong"


Gary Graham, executed by Texas despite serious doubts about his guilt.

Gary Graham was sentenced to death based solely on the identification of one eye witness.  Two other eye witnesses who say the killer was not Graham were never heard at trial.

Graham Jurors Urge New Trial

Jump to "The Cotton Case" from our Links page for a riveting demonstration of just how wrong eyewitness identification can be.
Truth in Justice

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 









Free Hit Counter
free hit counter