Defender Training and Development Standards

Printable version of the blackletter edition. (msword, 38 Kb)

Contents

PREFACE

1. Defender Training Structure & Funding
Standard 1.1 - Training is Essential
Standard 1.2 - Written Training Plan
Standard 1.3 - Adequate Financial Resources
Standard 1.4 - Training Director and Staff
Standard 1.5 - Organizational Position of Training Director
Standard 1.6 - Director and Staff Qualifications

2. Defender Training Needs Assessment
Standard 2.1 - Regular Needs Assessments
Standard 2.2 - Training Needs Assessment for Organization and for Employees

3. Learning Objectives and Curriculum
Standard 3.1 - Organizational Curriculum
Standard 3.2 - Ethics and Professional Responsibility

4. Learning Experience and Educational Methods
Standard 4.1 - Selection of Methods
Standard 4.2 - Training Staff and Qualifications
Standard 4.3 - Materials and Learning Technologies
Standard 4.4 -Learning as an Ongoing Process
Standard 4.5 - Ongoing Publications and Distribution of Training Materials
Standard 4.6 - Maintenance of Training Resources

5. Learning Environment
Standard 5.1 - Physical Setting
Standard 5.2 - Joint Training
Standard 5.3 - Limitations on Use of Defender Resources

6. Evaluation of Learning; Accreditation
Standard 6.1 - Systematic Evaluation of Programs and Materials
Standard 6.2 - Defender CLE Accreditation

7. Death Penalty Defense and Other Complex and Specialized Practice Areas
Standard 7.1 - Death Penalty Defense
Standard 7.2 -Complex and Specialized Practice Areas

8. Organizational Development
Standard 8.1 - Management and Leadership Skills

9. Quality Assurance
Standard 9.1 - Quality Assurance

Back to Top

Printable version of the blackletter edition. (msword, 38 Kb)

Blackletter

PREFACE
     The Defender Training and Development Standards (Training Standards) are promulgated by the National Legal Aid and Defender Association (NLADA). In furtherance of its mission of assuring the availability of high quality and competent legal representation to poor people, NLADA advocates for quality indigent defense representation in a variety of ways, including delivery of training programs and the publication of standards and guidelines on many aspects of the delivery of indigent defense services. These Training Standards, which should be read in conjunction with NLADA’s other criminal defense standards, are another attempt to promote and improve quality and competence in the delivery of criminal defense services to the poor.
     Nationally, indigent defense services face increasing complexity and severity in substantive and procedural criminal law, crushing workloads and inadequate resources. All of these factors threaten delivery of the effective legal representation which is guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. Broderick; Burke, Indigent Defense Caseloads and Common Sense: An Update (NLADA 1992); Klein; Spangenberg, The Indigent Defense Crisis (American Bar Association 1993). Quality training of all defender staff can improve the representation of indigent clients by making staff members more productive, efficient and effective. The results of a 1994 survey indicate that on average, across subject matters surveyed, 61% of defenders surveyed believed that the training available to them needed moderate to major improvement. Institute for Law & Justice, 1994. A number of members of a National Institute of Justice defender focus group identified the need to know “what works” in training as important to defender operations.
     Previously published NLADA criminal defense standards and guidelines recognize the importance of training, education and development among defender staff and call again and again for regular, organized, quality defender training. Performance Guidelines for Criminal Defense Representation, Guideline 1.2 (NLADA 1995); Standards for the Administration of Assigned Counsel Systems, Standards 4.3-4.4.2 (NLADA 1989); Standards for the Appointment and Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases, Standards 5.1, 9.1 (NLADA 1988); Guidelines for Negotiating and Awarding Governmental Contracts For Criminal Defense Services, Guideline III-17 (NLADA 1984); Standards and Evaluation Design for Appellate Defender Offices, Standard I(k) (NLADA 1980); Guidelines for Legal Defense Systems in the United States, Report of the National Study Commission on Defense Services, Guidelines 5.7, 5.8 (NLADA 1976); Standards for Defense Services, Standard V (NLADA 1976). Other national standards also recognize the critical importance of legal training generally and training for defenders in particular. Legal Education and Professional Development--An Educational Continuum: Report of the Task Force on Law Schools and the Profession: Narrowing the Gap (American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar (July 1992); McCrate, “A Fresh Look at Lawyers’ Education,” 27(1) Univ. of Richmond L. Rev. 21 (1992); Attaining Excellence in CLE (American Law Institute - American Bar Association Committee on Continuing Professional Education (1991); ABA Standards for Criminal Justice, Providing Defense Services, Standard 5-1.5 (3rd Ed. 1992) (Providing Defense Services); Courts, Chapter 13, “The Defense,” Standards 13.15, 13.16 (National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals 1973).
     In 1992, the American Bar Association formally established two important national benchmarks for defenders: 1) defenders and their staff should have training, development and education, and 2) the government, which has the constitutional duty to provide effective counsel for those it chooses to prosecute and who are too poor to hire their own counsel, should fund this training. These benchmarks are found in Providing Defense Services, Standard 5-1.5, “Training and professional development,” (1992), which states:

The legal representation plan should provide for the effective training, professional development and continuing education of all counsel and staff involved in providing defense services. Continuing education programs should be available, and public funds should be provided to enable all counsel and staff to attend such programs.

Back to Top

1. Defender Training Structure & Funding

Standard 1.1 - Training is Essential
     The defender organization must provide training opportunities that insure the delivery of zealous and quality representation to clients.

Standard 1.2 - Written Training Plan
      Every defender organization must have a clear, written plan, which includes specific goals and objectives, for offering training opportunities to all employees.

Standards 1.3 - Adequate Financial Resources
      Defender organizations must have adequate governmental funding for the resources to provide high quality training opportunities consistent with these standards.

Standard 1.4 - Training Director and Staff
     The leadership of the organization must ensure that the training efforts are administered and overseen by a person or persons who have training as a specific job duty, and whose other work duties are adjusted to ensure that the training responsibilities can be competently directed. That such person(s) should be provided with resources and staff to accomplish these responsibilities.

Standard 1.5 - Organizational Position of Training Director
      The organization’s leadership team should demonstrate a firm and consistent commitment to training as an integral part of the office’s practice. The person who is responsible for training should be a member of the organization’s leadership team or have a meaningful voice in its decisions with regard to the organization’s practices.

Standard 1.6 - Director and Staff Qualifications
      All employees who have training responsibilities should have abilities, experience and attitudes commensurate with their training responsibilities and assignments.

Back to Top

2. Defender Training Needs Assessment

Standard 2.1 - Regular Needs Assessments
      Every defender organization should, on a regular basis, identify and analyze its organizational and employee training needs to ensure that training efforts are responsive to those needs.

Standard 2.2 - Training Needs Assessment for Organization and for Employees
      Training needs assessments for the defender organization should be the responsibility of the training director. The supervision and evaluation of employees should include an annual training needs assessment for each employee.

3. Learning Objectives and Curriculum

Standard 3.1 - Organizational Curriculum
      The defender organization should have an organizational curriculum on how to provide zealous and quality representation to clients, which includes appropriate learning objectives for all its employees from entry level staff through the most experienced staff. Based upon the needs assessment findings, the defender organization should create a comprehensive curriculum with clear learning objectives for each of its training and development efforts.

Standard 3.2 - Ethics and Professional Responsibility
      The defender organization should offer training and develop materials on ethics and professional responsibility, and should include discussion of ethics and professional responsibility issues as they relate to intended learning objectives in training all employees.

4. Learning Experience and Educational Methods

Standard 4.1 - Selection of Methods
      The intended learning objectives in training efforts should determine the selection of instructional methods and strategies, the choice of accompanying program materials, the use of any technological aids which may be appropriate, and the length and location of the training.

Standard 4.2 - Training Staff and Qualifications
      Defender organizations’ trainers should be qualified by education, intellect, experience, teaching ability, and temperament to provide instruction which promotes the achievement of intended learning objectives. The defender organization should encourage employees to serve as trainers and should provide them with appropriate training.

Standard 4.3 - Materials and Learning Technologies
      Defender organizations’ trainers should use current learning technologies and media devices to augment the learning experience and promote the achievement of intended learning objectives. The defender organization should distribute instructional and comprehensive reference materials which promote the achievement of intended learning objectives.

Standard 4.4 - Learning as an Ongoing Process
      Defender organizations should encourage all employees to continue the learning process outside formal programs offered by the organization.

Standard 4.5 - Ongoing Publications and Distribution of Training Materials
      Defender organizations should develop and regularly publish independent training materials. These should include both permanent resources and continuing education on developments in the law. If resources are available, the defender organization should obtain and/or produce and distribute audio tapes, videotapes, and computer assisted instruction for its employees.

Standard 4.6 - Maintenance of Training Resources
      Defender organizations should maintain an accessible library of training materials developed by defenders within the organization as well as seek to collect training materials from outside resources which would be of benefit to its employees.

Back to Top

5. Learning Environment

Standard 5.1 - Physical Setting
      The physical environment and location for training should be conducive to learning and consistent with achieving intended learning objectives. Defender organizations should have adequate and well-trained staff at the training site to assist the training director with logistics and to facilitate the presentation of training activities.

Standard 5.2 - Joint Training
      Defender organizations should, when appropriate, pursue joint training opportunities with other members of the criminal justice system, the legal profession, and the community at large.

Standard 5.3 - Limitations on Use of Defender Resources
      Consistent with the duty owed to clients, the adversarial nature of the criminal justice system, and the promotion of full learning, some defender training programs and materials should not be available to non-defenders.

6. Evaluation of Learning; Accreditation

Standard 6.1 - Systematic Evaluation of Programs and Materials
      Defender organizations should conduct systematic and continuous evaluations of the effectiveness of its programs and materials to assess content, the achievement of intended learning objectives, program design, methods of instruction, quality of presenters, and impact on the participants’ future performance. These regular internal evaluations to training activities should be conducted by the training director for purposes of planning and improving training activities. In addition, the defender organization should seek an independent evaluation of the office’s training efforts and the strategic training plan by a person experienced in training.

Standard 6.2 - Defender CLE Accreditation
      Defender organizations should strive to satisfy the continuing legal education requirements of its staff. Where appropriate, the defender organization should seek accreditation by the jurisdiction’s continuing legal education authority as a continuing legal education provider.

7. Death Penalty Defense and Other Complex and Specialized Practice Areas

Standard 7.1 - Death Penalty Defense
      Defender organizations should provide employees responsible for the representation of death penalty clients with all training necessary for high quality service to the client at every stage of the process: pretrial, trial, penalty phase, appeal and post-conviction.

Standard 7.2 - Complex and Specialized Practice Areas
     Defender organizations should provide special training to employees responsible for the representation of clients with complex or especially difficult cases, as well as for those employees handling specialized areas of practice.

8. Organizational Development

Standard 8.1 - Management and Leadership Skills
      The defender organization should provide all supervisors and leaders with training in management, supervisory and training skills, as well as in leadership principles.

9. Quality Assurance

Standard 9.1 - Quality Assurance
      Defender organizations should develop and implement methods to insure zealous and quality representation for clients.

Back to Top

Printable version of the blackletter edition. (msword, 38 Kb)

Back to Top