Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 7 comments Add your own | iPod friendly
Judges look at reducing lawyer costs
Published Wednesday, November 7, 2007
NATCHEZ — Providing defense attorneys for defendants who cannot afford their own is becoming quite costly for Adams County.
In 2006 Adams County spent $125,000 on indigent defendants, in 2007 that figure jumped to $182,000.
But Circuit Court judges Forrest Johnson and Lillie Sanders think they may have a way to bring these costs back down.
At its essence the plan would contract defense lawyers at a yearly fixed rate.
As of now the court uses a list of local attorneys that have signed up to work as indigent defenders.
These lawyers are paid by the county.
These attorneys also work on a fluctuating pay scale that varies according to the type of case and time spent on the case.
The standard rate is normally around $500 for a defense attorney, Johnson said.
But if the case is a capital case or if the case goes into a lengthy trial the county funded lawyers can run up a hefty bill.
Johnson said each year his office handles more cases and the county has to pay more money.
“We can’t control the fees because we don’t know how many cases we’ll have,” he said.
And, Johnson said, since all defendants are to be provided with council, by law the county is opening itself up for unknown costs.
Between 2006-2007 Adams County spent $57,000 more on indigent defendants.
Under Johnson and Sanders’ newly proposed plan the county would acquire a team of lawyers that would essentially be on retainer for a fixed price.
This would allow judges to try an infinite number of cases with out fear of running up enormous legal bills.
In theory a team of three or four lawyers would serve as indigent defenders for Adams County for a predetermined sum.
The lawyers would then divide the money amongs themselves.
Johnson said many counties in Mississippi, including Pike and Lincoln are already successfully using similar programs.
In fact, Johnson said, Adams County is one of only a few counties that still hires defense attorney on a per case basis.
On Nov. 5, Sanders and Johnson presented their idea to the Adams County Board of Supervisors and received positive feedback.
President of the Adams County Board of Supervisors Darryl Grennell asked the team to prepare a formal proposal of their plan for the board’s review.
“This could mean a major savings for the county,” Grennell said.
Grennell also said similar plans have been presented to the board in the past, but for unknown reasons, have never made it as far as the formal proposal stage.



Comments
Posted by NtzMom55 (anonymous) on November 7, 2007 at 12:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You know what would save even more money? Take those wrist slapping rulers and stupid revolving doors out of the Judges' hands and courtrooms so that maybe we could save even more money from not having to continue hireing attorneys for the endless line of repeat offenders. Ever though about that, Board of Supervisors?
Posted by beammeupscotty (anonymous) on November 7, 2007 at 3:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The federal government has sent billions of dollars to Pakistan. They are rounding up all the lawyers over there. We can bail them out of jail and bring them here to represent our criminals. We import everything else so why not.
Posted by beammeupscotty (anonymous) on November 7, 2007 at 9:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Another thought, why don't we give criminals an offer they can't refuse. Then there will be no trials and no lawyer costs. Make the deals good enough and we can do away with the judges too. Take it to the extreme do away with all of it and have a price menu for crimes. No more bargaining, you know going in what it will cost to committ the crime. I guess we would have to offer specials and coupons so we can keep them happy.
Posted by lookingout (anonymous) on November 7, 2007 at 9:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
lol @ beammeupscottyy
Posted by hawk (anonymous) on November 7, 2007 at 12:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
the cost of the attorneys could be lowered if the crime rate in natchez was addressed. but the mayor is more concerned about a rec center than this highly important issue. sure lets build a rec ctr so they will have a place to sale drugs and committ murder at the tax payers expense and also we will pay your attorney fees when you get busted but you wont be in long for the crime your bail will be lowered so you can get back on the street.
Posted by buttercup26 (anonymous) on November 7, 2007 at 6:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
NATCHEZ DOESN'T NEED A 'REC CENTER' IT NEEDS A PLACE FOR CHILDREN!! OF ALL AGES!! CHUCKY CHEESES, PUT PUT GOLF, PLAY GROUND, EVEN MAYBE A SKATE PARK TYPE DEAL FOR THE OLDER ONES!! there is a skate park here and it does wonders for these teenage boys around here that would have nothing else better to do!!
Posted by destiny (anonymous) on November 7, 2007 at 6:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
good
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)